Application of fermatean fuzzy weight operators and MCDM model DIBR-DIBR II-NWBM-BM for efficiency-based selection of a complex combat system

Authors

  • Dusko Tešić Military academy, University of Defense, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Dragan Marinković Department of Structural Analysis, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31181/10002122023t

Keywords:

DIBR, DIBR II, NWBM, FFWO, MCDM, selection, complex combat systems

Abstract

The use of complex automated combat systems is a basic feature of every modern combat operation, and all modern armies strive to implement such systems in their units. This paper investigates the choice of a complex combat system based on the efficiency criteria that condition it. The Defining Interrelationships Between Ranked criteria (DIBR) and the Defining Interrelationships Between Ranked criteria II (DIBR II) methods were used to determine the weight coefficients of the criteria, which proved to be effective in assessing the importance of each criterion in the context of making complex decisions. Aggregation of expert opinions, for each of the methods, was performed using the Normalized Weighted Bonferroni Mean (NWBM) operator. After the weight coefficients for both methods were obtained, the aggregation of the obtained values was performed using the Bonferroni Mean (BM) operator, which resulted in the final values of the weight coefficients of the criteria. In order to choose the optimal alternative, the Fermatean Fuzzy Weight Operators (FFWO) and BM operator were used. These operators contributed to the precise evaluation and ranking of alternatives, taking into account their characteristics and specificities.  Furthermore, the paper analyzed the sensitivity of the output results to changes in the weight coefficients of the criteria. This is important in order to assess the stability of the Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) model and ensure its reliability in different scenarios. This work represents a significant contribution to the field of decision-making in this context and provides a useful framework for the selection of complex combat systems, and the combination of different methods and operators enables a comprehensive analysis and optimization of the research problem.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akram, M., Shahzadi, S., Shah, S. M. U., & Allahviranloo, T. (2023a). A fully Fermatean fuzzy multi-objective transportation model using an extended DEA technique. Granular Computing, 8, 1173-1204.

Akram, M., Amjad, U., Alcantud, J. C. R., & Santos-García, G. (2023b). Complex fermatean fuzzy N-soft sets: a new hybrid model with applications. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 14(7), 8765-8798.

Akram, M., Bibi, R., & Deveci, M. (2023c). An outranking approach with 2-tuple linguistic Fermatean fuzzy sets for multi-attribute group decision-making. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 121, 105992.

Ardil, C. (2021). A comparative analysis of multiple criteria decision making analysis methods for strategic, tactical, and operational decisions in military fighter aircraft selection. International Journal of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, 14(7), 275-288.

Ardil, C. (2022). Military Combat Aircraft Selection Using Trapezoidal Fuzzy Numbers with the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). International Journal of Computer and Information Engineering, 15(12), 630-635.

Ardil, C. (2023a). Unmanned Combat Aircraft Selection using Fuzzy Proximity Measure Method in Multiple Criteria Group Decision Making. International Journal of Computer and Systems Engineering, 17(3), 238-245.

Ardil, C. (2023b). Using the PARIS Method for Multiple Criteria Decision Making in Unmanned Combat Aircraft Evaluation and Selection. International Journal of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, 17(3), 93-103.

Ayough A., Shargh S. B., & Khorshidvand B. (2023). A new integrated approach based on base-criterion and utility additive methods and its application to supplier selection problem. Expert Systems with Applications, 221, 119740.

Badi, I., Stević, Ž., & Bayane Bouraima, M. (2023). Overcoming Obstacles to Renewable Energy Development in Libya: An MCDM Approach towards Effective Strategy Formulation. Decision Making Advances, 1(1), 17-24.

Bakır, M., Akan, Ş., & Özdemir, E. (2021). Regional aircraft selection with fuzzy PIPRECIA and fuzzy MARCOS: A case study of the Turkish airline industry. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering, 19(3), 423-445.

Bonferroni, C. (1950). Sulle medie multiple di potenze. Bollettino Matematica Italiana, 5(3-4), 267-270.

Božanić, D. I., & Pamučar, D. S. (2010). Evaluating locations for river crossing using fuzzy logic. Military Technical Courier, 58(1), 129-145.

Božanić, D., & Pamucar, D. (2023). Overview of the Method Defining Interrelationships Between Ranked Criteria II and Its Application in Multi-criteria Decision-Making. In Computational Intelligence for Engineering and Management Applications: Select Proceedings of CIEMA 2022 (pp. 863-873). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

Božanić, D., Pamučar, D., Milić, A., Marinković, D., & Komazec N. (2022). Modification of the Logarithm Methodology of Additive Weights (LMAW) by a Triangular Fuzzy Number and Its Application in Multi-Criteria Decision Making. Axioms, 11(3), 89.

Božanić, D., Epler, I., Puška, A., Biswas, S., Marinković, D., & Koprivica, S. (2023a). Application of the DIBR II – rough MABAC decision-making model for ranking methods and techniques of Lean organization systems management in the process of technical maintenance. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering (Online first). DOI: https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME230614026B.

Božanić, D., Pamucar, D., Badi, I., & Tešić, D. (2023b). A decision support tool for oil spill response strategy selection: application of LBWA and Z MABAC methods. Opsearch, 60(1), 24-58.

Chakraborty, S., & Saha, A. K. (2023). Novel Fermatean Fuzzy Bonferroni Mean aggregation operators for selecting optimal health care waste treatment technology. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 119, 105752.

Chang, K. H., Chung, H. Y., Wang, C. N., Lai, Y. D., & Wu, C. H. (2023). A new hybrid Fermatean fuzzy set and entropy method for risk assessment. Axioms, 12(1), 58.

Dağıstanlı, H. A. (2023). An Integrated Fuzzy MCDM and Trend Analysis Approach for Financial Performance Evaluation of Energy Companies in Borsa Istanbul Sustainability Index. Journal of Soft Computing and Decision Analytics, 1(1), 39-49.

Deveci M., Pamucar D., Gokasar I., Delen D., Wu Q., & Simic V. (2022). An analytics approach to decision alternative prioritization for zero-emission zone logistics. Journal of Business Research, 146, 554-570.

Deveci, M., Varouchakis, E. A., Brito-Parada, P. R., Mishra, A. R., Rani, P., Bolgkoranou, M., & Galetakis, M. (2023). Evaluation of risks impeding sustainable mining using Fermatean fuzzy score function based SWARA method. Applied Soft Computing, 139, 110220.

Dwivedi, P. P., & Sharma, D. K. (2023). Selection of Combat Aircraft by Using Shannon Entropy and VIKOR Method. Defence Science Journal, 73(4).

Eremina, G., Smolin, A., & Martyshina, I. (2022). Convergence analysis and validation of a discrete element model of the human lumbar spine. Reports in Mechanical Engineering, 3(1), 62-70.

Fahmi, A., Amin, F., Eldin, S. M., Shutaywi, M., Deebani, W., & Al Sulaie, S. (2023). Multiple attribute decision-making based on Fermatean fuzzy number. AIMS Mathematics, 8(5), 10835-10863.

Fan, J., Li, D., Li, R., Yang, T., & Wang, Q. (2017). Analysis for cooperative combat system of manned-unmanned aerial vehicles and combat simulation. The Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Unmanned Systems (ICUS) (pp. 204-209). Beijing: IEEE.

Gergin, R. E., Peker, İskender, & Gök Kısa, A. C. (2022). Supplier selection by integrated IFDEMATEL-IFTOPSIS Method: A case study of automotive supply industry. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 5(1), 169-193.

Gokasar, I., & Karaman, O. (2023). Integration of Personnel Services with Public Transportation Modes: A Case Study of Bogazici University. Journal of Soft Computing and Decision Analytics, 1(1), 1-17.

Görçün, Ö. F., Pamucar, D., & Biswas, S. (2023). The blockchain technology selection in the logistics industry using a novel MCDM framework based on Fermatean fuzzy sets and Dombi aggregation. Information Sciences, 635, 345-374.

Hu, L., Yi, G., Nan, Y., Zhao, H., Wang, H., & Cao, Z. (2022). Dynamic effectiveness evaluation of weapon system based on PFCSM method. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2181(1), 012033.

Kovač, M., Dulanović, Ž., Stojković, D. (2006) Determining the effectiveness of military organizational systems (Only in Serbian: Određivanje efikasnosti vojnoorganizacionih sistema). Belgrade: Military Publishing House.

Kulik, T. (2021). The Multi-Criteria Method for the Evaluation of Combat Capabilities of Surface to Air Missile Systems for the NAREW Program. Safety & Defense, 2, 90-104.

Mishra, A. R., Chen, S. M., & Rani, P. (2023). Multicriteria decision making based on novel score function of Fermatean fuzzy numbers, the CRITIC method, and the GLDS method. Information Sciences, 623, 915-931.

Mondal, S., Das, M., Mukhopadhyay, S., & Bag, K. (2021). An integrated decision-making model for wind turbine blade material. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Decision Making, 2(1), 15-21.

Muhammad, L. J., Badi, I., Haruna, A. A. & Mohammed, I. A. (2021). Selecting the Best Municipal Solid Waste Management Techniques in Nigeria Using Multi Criteria Decision Making Techniques. Reports in Mechanical Engineering, 2(1), 180-189.

Pamučar, D., Božanić, D., & Đorović, B. (2011a). Fuzzy logic in decision making process in the Armed Forces of Serbia. Saarbrücken: LAMBERT Academic Publishing.

Pamučar, D., Božanić, D., Đorović, B., & Milić, A. (2011b). Modelling of the fuzzy logical system for offering support in making decisions within the engineering units of the Serbian army. International journal of the physical sciences, 6(3), 592-609.

Pamučar, D., Đorović, B., Božanić, D., & Ćirović, G. (2012). Modification of the dynamic scale of marks in analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and analytic network approach (ANP) through application of fuzzy approach. Scientific Research and Essays, 7(1), 24-37.

Pamučar, D., Božanić, D., Milić, A. (2016). Selection of a course of action by Obstacle Employment Group based on a fuzzy logic system. Yugoslav journal of operations research, 26(1), 75-90.

Pamucar, D., Deveci, M., Gokasar, I., Işık, M., & Zizovic, M. (2021). Circular economy concepts in urban mobility alternatives using integrated DIBR method and fuzzy Dombi CoCoSo model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 323, 129096.

Pamucar D., Simic V., Lazarević D., Dobrodolac M., & Deveci, M. (2022). Prioritization of sustainable mobility sharing systems using integrated fuzzy DIBR and fuzzy-rough EDAS model. Sustainable Cities and Society, 82, 103910.

Puška, A., Nedeljković, M., Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., & Pamučar, D. (2021). Application of Interval Fuzzy Logic in Selecting a Sustainable Supplier on the Example of Agricultural Production. Symmetry, 13(5), 774.

Puška, A., Štilić, A., & Stojanović, I. (2023). Approach for multi-criteria ranking of Balkan countries based on the index of economic freedom. Journal of Decision Analytics and Intelligent Computing, 3(1), 1–14.

Saha, A., Pamucar, D., Gorcun, O. F., & Mishra, A. R. (2023). Warehouse site selection for the automotive industry using a fermatean fuzzy-based decision-making approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 211, 118497.

Sahoo, S. K., & Goswami, S. S. (2023). A Comprehensive Review of Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) Methods: Advancements, Applications, and Future Directions. Decision Making Advances, 1(1), 25-48.

Scopus (2023a) Defining Interrelationships Between Ranked criteria. Available at: https://www.scopus.com/results/results.uri?sort=plf-f&src=s&st1=Defining+Interrelationships+Between+Ranked+criteria&sid=31e67b19b875b3acb2b71320b137c373&sot=b&sdt=b&sl=66&s=TITLE-ABS-KEY%28Defining+Interrelationships+Between+Ranked+criteria%29&origin=searchbasic&editSaveSearch=&yearFrom=Before+1960&yearTo=Present&sessionSearchId=31e67b19b875b3acb2b71320b137c373&limit=10. Accessed 08/22/2023.

Scopus (2023b) Fermatean fuzzy. Available at: https://www.scopus.com/results/results.uri?sort=plf-f&src=s&st1=Fermatean+fuzzy&sid=fe90a82d1f0692a180aabf4b43f67cc4&sot=b&sdt=b&sl=30&s=TITLE-ABS-KEY%28Fermatean+fuzzy%29&origin=searchbasic&editSaveSearch=&yearFrom=Before+1960&yearTo=Present&sessionSearchId=fe90a82d1f0692a180aabf4b43f67cc4&limit=10. Accessed 08/23/2023.

Senapati, T., & Yager, R. R. (2019). Fermatean fuzzy weighted averaging/geometric operators and its application in multi-criteria decision-making methods. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 85, 112-121.

Senapati, T., & Yager, R. R. (2020). Fermatean fuzzy sets. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 11, 663-674.

Simic, V., Ebadi Torkayesh, A., & Ijadi Maghsoodi, A. (2023). Locating a disinfection facility for hazardous healthcare waste in the COVID-19 era: a novel approach based on Fermatean fuzzy ITARA-MARCOS and random forest recursive feature elimination algorithm. Annals of Operations Research, 328(1), 1105-1150.

Sun, L., Chang, J., Zhang, J., Fu, Z., & Zou, J. (2021). Evaluation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Cooperative Combat Effectiveness Based on Conditional Entropy Combination Weight Method. Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management, 13, e3621.

Tenório, F.M., dos Santos, M., Gomes, C.F.S., & Araujo, J.d.C. (2020). Navy Warship Selection and Multicriteria Analysis: The THOR Method Supporting Decision Making. In: Thomé, A.M.T., Barbastefano, R.G., Scavarda, L.F., dos Reis, J.C.G., Amorim, M.P.C. (eds), Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IJCIEOM 2020). Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 337 (pp. 27-39). Cham: Springer.

Tešić D., Radovanović M., Božanić D., Pamucar D., Milić A., & Puška A. (2022). Modification of the DIBR and MABAC Methods by Applying Rough Numbers and Its Application in Making Decisions. Information (Switzerland), 13 (8), 353.

Tešić D., Božanić D., Stojković D., Puška A., & Stojanović I. (2023). DIBR-DOMBI-FUZZY MAIRCA Model for Strategy Selection in the System of Defense. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2023, 4961972.

Torkayesh, S. E., Iranizad, A., Torkayesh, A. E., & Basit, M. N. (2020). Application of BWM-WASPAS model for digital supplier selection problem: A case study in online retail shopping. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Decision Making, 1(1), 12-23.

Wang, J., Song, D., Ma, C., Wang, J., & Jiang, J. (2020). Method for Assessing Operational Readiness of Shipborne Combat System based on AHP and Channel Association. The Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 5th Information Technology and Mechatronics Engineering Conference (ITOEC) (pp. 1305-1312). Chongqing: IEEE.

Zhou, J., Baležentis, T., & Streimikiene, D. (2019). Normalized Weighted Bonferroni Harmonic Mean-Based Intuitionistic Fuzzy Operators and Their Application to the Sustainable Selection of Search and Rescue Robots. Symmetry, 11(2), 218.

Published

02.12.2023

How to Cite

Tešić, D., & Marinković, D. (2023). Application of fermatean fuzzy weight operators and MCDM model DIBR-DIBR II-NWBM-BM for efficiency-based selection of a complex combat system. Journal of Decision Analytics and Intelligent Computing, 3(1), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.31181/10002122023t